Mathilde Loisel lives in a flat with her husband, who works as a clerk for the Minister of Education. Their lives are not luxurious, but they are not poor, merely simple. Mathilde, however, longs to be rich. She envies her friend Jeanne who has a large house and lots of jewelry.
In the end, Mathilde seems fated to be in the class she was born into, and class mobility seems an impossibility. Is Maupassant critiquing the rigidity of rigid class structures or is he suggesting that she is right to finally accept this class status?
Take a position on this issue then argue and support your answer with specific examples from the text. Define the traits and aspects of horror and demonstrate how they are evident in the story. On the contrary, the story is an example of what happens when a person accepts the dictation of society, in particular the structure of social class, and the curse of that befallen the beautiful and fashionable Mathilde Loisel, a common wife to a common man of common salary.
As the society of 19th century France or any place and time period for that matterattached so much importance to elegance and class, Mme. Loisel strives to cope, and her chance to be included with the circle of the high-class elites even for a night presented itself with an invitation to a ball that her husband came home with.
The problem is, Monsieur Loisel does not have that amount of money to dress his wife with expensive clothes, let alone buy her jewelries.
Despite these hindrances, Mme. Loisel had the best time of her life that evening, but it all ended to a disaster when she found out that she lost the necklace, and no matter how hard she searched for it, she was unsuccessful. There was no other choice but to pay it, and in the next ten years, the couple has worked very hard to save for the lost necklace.
Loisel turned into a creature of her own nightmare, with the body and face of common wife who has toiled all her life, losing all the youth and beauty she had before. In an anti-climax, it turned out that the necklace was an imitation, thus concluding that Mme.
Indeed, Mathilde Loisel is not the best of character, and her shallowness and discontentment bordering on conceit and self-entitlement good appearances do make people feel more important played a significant role in her tragedy Mariyam Born with beauty and delicate appearance, as well as sunny personality, Mathilde Loisel has always thought that she is promised for all the luxury and pleasure life may bring.
Her obsession with class and anything high-standing, as well as coveting possessions that her good husband cannot afford, however, spells trouble, of which catastrophic consequences she might have deserved.
The society in the story places great significance to appearances, such that everything black and white in the soul can be easily covered by rich outfits, and shiny jewelries Fonseka 7.
The Loisels are example of victims of such society that set standards and class structures that people must strive to equal, or be a member of to gain acceptance and recognition, because without it, everyone is just a passing entity that no one gives a care to.
In the end, both the Loisels were slaves to keeping up appearances, especially when they took upon themselves to work hard to replace the lost necklace, without even bothering to tell Mme. Forestier of the situation, lest they revealed their poverty and low-class status 4.
A necklace in itself is a representation of something innately good, but it is still a material that can be pawned, sold, bought, and used for evil means.
A necklace, as any kind of jewelry, may represent materialism. Losing it on the night when her dreams were fulfilled is paradoxical, as the lesson that materialism can corrupt people and make them ugly inside and out.
Mathilde Loisel lost her beauty to hard work, trying to pay for a necklace that turned out to be a fake. In a way, Mathilde Loisel has been working for something unworthy since the very beginning, as the possessions she coveted are just transient things in life.
Works Cited Fonseka, E. A Critique of Class Consciousness. Accessed 12 November A Study of Women in 19th Century France.
Henry and Guy de Maupassant [J]. Create a PowerPoint montage of the interpretations of the character Sherlock Holmes over the generations, noting how the character endures, even with changes, making him one of the most recognizable literary characters in history.
How are the overall themes of the stories similar or different?According to SparkNotes, "The Necklace" by Guy De Maupassant centers on Mathilde Loisel, a woman of modest means with a desire for wealth. Preparing for a party, Mathilde borrows a necklace from a rich friend, only to lose the jewelry that night.
She and her husband take out loans to replace the. They secure the thirty-six thousand for the necklace from Mr.
Loisel’s inheritance and in the form of loans. They struggle and live in poverty for ten years to pay off the necklace. By now, Matilde looks old. Madame Forestier went to her mirrored wardrobe, took out a large box, brought it back, opened it, and said to Madame Loisel: "Choose, my dear." First she saw some bracelets, then a pearl necklace, then a gold Venetian cross set with precious stones, of exquisite craftsmanship.
The The Necklace quotes below are all either spoken by Mathilde Loisel or refer to Mathilde Loisel. For each quote, you can also see the other characters and themes related to it (each theme is indicated by its own dot and icon, like this one:).
Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” Guy de Maupassant, “The Necklace”: In the end, Mathilde seems fated to be in the class she was born into, and class mobility seems an impossibility. He implores her to visit Madame Forestier and borrow something from her. Madame Forestier agrees to lend Mathilde her jewels, and Mathilde selects a diamond necklace.
She is overcome with gratitude at Madame Forestier’s generosity.
At the party, Mathilde is the most beautiful woman in attendance, and everyone notices her.